Talk:Kirsty Duncan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Ontario / Toronto / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jordan Stawinski. Peer reviewers: Adriannaphillips, Hanna.sutherland, NRomard.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Hello, I hope I am following the outlined proceedures properly. I'll be brief. Dr. Kirsty Duncan has accomplished a great deal in her career and I think the story of her research into pandemics including the 1918 Spanish Flu (where she led an expedition to locate and recover samples from graves burried in permafrost on a remote northern Norwegian island) as well as her involvement in Canadian Federal politics deserves a notation on Wikipedia. Her work has been the subject of documentaries on A&E and the BBC, she has two published books on her expedition, and she was chosen to succeed the retiring Roy Cullen for the nomination to represent the riding of Etobicoke North, Canada. I hope this meets with the necessary criteria. Please provide any assistance needed to complete this page. Thank you for your patience.

Anthony Melihen

PS: I noticed that the title is listed as Kirsty duncan, with a lower case 'd'... Naturally, it should be "Duncan", I hope this can be fixed. Thanks again.

Only 4 hits on Google News[edit]

http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&tab=wn&nolr=1&q=%22Kirsty+Duncan%22&btnG=Search —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.35.246 (talk) 17:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, no. Mr. Absurd (talk) 22:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. You are right. We are both right. I clicked the Canadian pages. Thanks for the point. ;-) North Etobian (talk) 01:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mind you, she did not win the Nobel Prize and I will soon be editting suchg to something more accurate.
This article is pretty biased in favour of her. North Etobian (talk) 01:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. But if you re-read the article you'll see I've made some pretty heavy changes to remove the obvious bias. It's much bettter now, I think. Mr. Absurd (talk) 02:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. A far better job than I could have easily done. Thanks ;-) North Etobian (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now on Wikinfo[edit]

Kirsty Duncan 70.54.181.70 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?[edit]

The fact that this article is identical to the bio on Duncan's website makes me suspicious, so I reported this article at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems#Kirsty Duncan --Padraic 23:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the history of this article. Duncan's website was added on December 15, 2009. The text on her website existed on Wikipedia pretty much unchanged for over a year prior to this addition of the website link. I suggest that Duncan's website was built with a little bit of copy/paste in order to create the bio page, not the other way around. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirsty Duncan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150815061116/http://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=can&dir=cand%2Fcanlim&document=index&lang=e to http://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=can&dir=cand%2Fcanlim&document=index&lang=e

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak citation[edit]

I find the citation for the statement "However, the samples were not viable, as the bodies were not in the permafrost, and the expedition ultimately proved a disappointment." to be weak. This is reference [7], "Digging up the deadly past". The National. Martin Newland. 2008-09-25. Retrieved 2009-09-30.

That link is no longer accessible. Is there a better reference to support that statement? Or, should the statement be changed to better reflect the results of the research?

Respectfully, Aquick777 (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose the following:

(1) removing reference [7], since it is no longer accessible,

(2) changing the sentence "However, the samples were not viable, as the bodies were not in the permafrost, and the expedition ultimately proved a disappointment." to "While the excavation was exemplary in terms of archeological procedures and treatment of culturally sensitive sites, it did not yield samples from which the virus could be reconstructed because the bodies were not in the permafrost."

(3) adding the reference "Excavating the Flu" at https://definingmomentscanada.ca/the-spanish-flu/themes/excavating-the-flu/

Respectfully, Aquick777 (talk) 02:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added the above reference - it becomes [9]. Removed reference [7] - references were renumbered so now reference [7] is a good reference.

Aquick777 (talk) 16:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]