Talk:Kingittorsuaq Runestone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Location[edit]

The runic stone was NOT found at Kingittortallit Island, it was found at Kingittorsuaq island 72° 51′ 0″ N, 55° 29′ 0″ W

Hans Peter Blytmann Upernavik —Preceding unsigned comment added by HansPiita (talkcontribs) 18:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that the stone was found in or near Upernavik. The panel on the right states Nuuk, Sermersooq. But Nuuk is nowhere near Upernavik. What does the side panel trying to say? (I've removed the contents) Alexgenaud (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Pentadic numerals?[edit]

Where are the supposed Pentadic numerals? 惑乱 分からん 09:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find them in the picture. Maybe they are in the Spirit Pond runestones :-) Petri Krohn 02:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"gagndag" or "gangdag"?[edit]

The original text reads "gagndag"; the English translation has: "gangdag". Is it a typo? JmCor (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inscription Mojibake[edit]

The Latin transliteration of the runestone's test seems to be some sort of mojibake, Mojibake description what is it supposed to say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khu'hamgaba Kitap (talkcontribs) 19:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingittorsuaq Runestone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]