Talk:King of arms
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Do the Activities of Fantasy / Theatre / Reenactment Groups Fairly Fall Under the Scope of This Article?
I say nay. The scope of this piece is actually existing and historical systems of heraldry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.10.36.231 (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Does this group use title King of Arms? Yes. Is this notable? Yes. So, it can be included.--Yopie (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- An includible fact should be not only notable, but also relevant. The SCA item does not pass the test. Heraldry, as Yopie should know, is derived through the grace of a monarch. Play acting does not fall within the category of actual Heraldry. Kindly do not revert my edits unless or until consensus develops around another viewpoint. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.10.36.231 (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on King of Arms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060203081406/http://www.gg.ca/heraldry/index_e.asp to http://www.gg.ca/heraldry/index_e.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on King of Arms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816123545/http://www.nli.ie/fr_offi2.htm to http://www.nli.ie/fr_offi2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Crown or coronet?[edit]
It has no arches, and therefore I would assume it would be considered a coronet, but it's referred to in the caption as "crown". Is there some unique precedent for it being call a crown nonetheless? If that's the case then there should be some brief explanation included. `Trilobright (talk) 11:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)