Talk:King You of Zhou

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

King You is not yet discussed about. Please e-mail us to tell us about him so we can make a page, or just make one yourself.

Me?[edit]

LOL

You[edit]

literary meaning: "serene", make no sense, 壅遏不通曰幽蚤孤铺位曰幽动祭乱常曰幽, this is one of the worst name.--刻意(Kèyì) 14:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion[edit]

I have removed the sentence 'King You's folly predates Aesop's classical tale of the The Boy Who Cried Wolf by more than one hundred years'. If there is no evidence of the truth of this story other than that of a historian 600 years after the event, such a statement is questionable. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 17:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given that Chinese historians have considered the particular source (Records of the Grand Historian) to be a reliable source for thousands of years, I think that the idea that it is unreliable (vis-a-vis the ancientness of the period — I am not claiming that it is "reliable" in the sense that modern documents that contain direct evidence is reliable) is unwarranted. Still, I do believe that the sentence was probably correctly removed due to implicit POVness. --Nlu (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]