Talk:Kimberly-Clark/Archives/2013

Actions against Kimberly-Clark

I know that kimberly-clark may be doing things wrong, but changing the website address to one that is againg kimberly-clark is not the best way to express your thought against them...

and it is certainly agains the wikipedia philosophy....

--200.45.50.103 18:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Merged product articles

Most of Kimberly-Clark's product lines don't warrant their own articles. Wikipedia is not a product catalog. A commercial product needs to be significant part of the culture before it warrants its own article. I merged their information with this main article and made them redirect here. --Tysto 17:45, 2005 September 5 (UTC)

Neutrality Dispute -- Still Active?

I don't see anything recent on this talk page about the neutrality dispute, leading me to believe that it may no longer be ongoing. Given that the last thing signed by a logged-in user was over a year ago, and that both of the concerns expressed above seem to have been addressed, I'm going to take the liberty of removing the neutrality dispute tag from the article. If there *is* still a dispute, please document it here on the talk page before restoring the dispute tag to the article. Thanks, -- Jonadab, 2006 Dec 16.

Fair use rationale for Image:Pullupsgirlboxold.jpg

Image:Pullupsgirlboxold.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Whore House?

In the history section, there is a mention of Kimberly-Clark,s founders also running a whore house. However, there are no sources anywhere for this, and no verifiable weblinks that support this statement. Should this be removed as a defamatory statement until verification is found? Kevin 6-April-2008 (Unregistered visitor)

Who is Donald Russell Martin Jr?

A quick Google search reveals nothing? Also, there is no citation for it, is it an act of clever trolling by inserting disinformation?

184.145.56.73 (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Business Units

This article does not include a discussion of the several business units of KCC. These include KC-Healthcare, KC-Professional, and KC-Scientific. Should these each be separate articles or should they be included as sections of this article?

NB: I am currently employed by Kimberly-Clark. Rhinocerous Ranger (talk) 15:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

John Bergstrom

The John Bergstrom linked in the Governance section is the wrong John Bergstrom. The correct John Bergstrom is this John Bergstrom. There isn't an article for this John Bergstrom, as far as I can tell. Radon360 (talk) 03:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)