Talk:Kim Glover
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled[edit]
I nominated this for deletion because it is pointless to have Kim Glover redirect to New Kids on the Block. She was one of a few managers for that group, and she has also managed other groups. Maybe someone could do some research and write an article about her, since I see she is mentioned in several other Wikipedia articles, but in my opinion, this redirect should go.--Susan118 (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should not be encouraging discussion here; please discuss at its listing on Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. --Susan118 (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I'll attempt to create the article as a stub with basic information, hopefully someone with more resources, better writing skills, and more interest in the topic, will come along and expand it. --Susan118 (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Removed POV and peacock terms[edit]
"After reaching the pinnacle of in-house promotions, Kim decided to reform Girl Friday Promotions. As soon as the industry heard this she was deluged with offers, the first of which came from CBS and this is where history was made."
I had to completely remove this sentence, as it is full of problematic phrases:"reaching the pinnacle of in-house promotions", "deluged with offers", "this is where history was made". Since there is no source, I'm removing it altogether as opposed to rewriting it. There were a few other places I replaced or removed words such as "illustrious". WP:PEACOCK explains why terms like these should be avoided.--Susan118 (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)