Talk:Kerryn Goldsworthy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Kerryn Goldsworthy is definitely a notable critic and writer. This is a good article. 121.44.250.6 07:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are claims made and quotes that don't seem to be sourced. That should be fixed I think. Torrensriver 07:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is Kerryn Goldsworthy a "retired academic"? By her own description, yes she is[1]. I think that should settle the matter. It doesn't say she's retired in the traditional sense even if she's no longer working in a full-time job, she might be writing full-time as a freelancer. I don't know. But I do know that calling someone a "resigned academic" is weird and awkward. Please stop changing it. 121.44.250.6 14:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The SMH book review you've cited there is not relevant. The 'retired academic' mentioned in it is a fictional character, the narrator of the novel being reviewed - emphatically not 'her own description'. I am altering it to 'former', which is both standard and neutral. Sills bend 00:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The SMH review is clearly relevant and directly on point. It matters little whether the character is fictional, the point is that it is an appropriate, very much standard description that the author herself applies in exactly the same way. Retiring from academic life does not connote retirement from full-time work necessarily, although that's what Goldsworthy appears to have done. Since when has "retirement" become a pejorative? 59.167.80.91 00:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as she did not retire in the commonly understood meaning of that word, in fact she resigned which is on the public record (see the reference to the article called 'Neeidng His Signature'), it's simply not accurate. 'Former', however, is accurate. There is no need for you to come back and revert it to 'resigned' or 'retired'.

She retired from academia, that's the point isn't it? I think it works better as retired, it doesn't mean she's retired from working as the rest of the article makes clear.

Bibliography[edit]

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 10:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kerryn Goldsworthy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kerryn_Goldsworthy&oldid=1204976061"