Talk:Keolis Downer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yarra Trams Merger[edit]

  • I believe this article should be merged with Yarra Trams, for a number of reasons. Firstly KDI will be retaining the yarra trams name, secondly it simply doesn't warrant an article of its own.Jixor (talk) 08:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps we should have an article on Yarra Trams (1999 - 2009) when it was operated by: Transdev & Transfield Services and and a separate article for Yarra Trams operated by KDR (which consists of: Keolis & Downer EDI Rail).Sheepunderscore (talk) 07:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some thoughts V/Line has everything in one article even though it has been a brand of government authority, a brand of a private company, and then a corporation that happened to be government owned. If a 'KDR Melbourne' page would exist it would only really cover who the members of the consortium are, perhaps it would be better redirected to 'Yarra Trams', that article having the history section divided up by owner. Wongm (talk) 08:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good suggestion Wongm, however I see your idea of having two sections in the one article as pertentually confusing. I propose having two seperate articles, one article named Yarra Trams (MetroLink Victoria Pty Ltd) or Yarra Trams (1999 - 2009) and one named Yarra Trams (KDR Melbourne Pty Ltd).Sheepunderscore (talk) 01:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copied the following contribution from the Yarra Trams talk page: -- Sheepunderscore (talk) 04:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am proposing we merge the article on KDR Melbourne into this article. Per [this Herald Sun article], it states "The name Yarra Trams will be retained by the new operator, KDR, but the branding will also be updated, costing $15 million." Thus, a merge may be required. Leaving this for discussion -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • And I would still support a merge. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 06:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • TransdevTSL has it's own page, mainly because it also runs Shorelink and Brisbane Ferries. Unless KDR Melbourne are likely to start new projects, I think the page should be rolled in to Yarra Trams. I don't see the need for two separate Yarra Trams pages, TransdevTSL's ownership would fall under the history heading and if more detail on that is required it could go on TransdevTSL's page.--Stuart K. Foster (talk) 07:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keolis Downer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Keolis_Downer&oldid=1207951933"