This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
I've removed two remarks about copywrite - the article is original. All the information is from the reference mentioned on the page Jowaninpensans (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have now been threatened (on my user page) with vandalism from someone in Bangladesh. I repeat, the article is one hundred percent written by myself using the reference on the page as my source. The only part copied is in quotations i.e. "proud local name". The only thing that is the same as the http://www.worldstadia.com/ws/show-page.php?menuCommand=stadium&menuData=1869&menuSubData=edit is "Kenwyn Rugby Ground" - please prove to me that is copywrite. Furthermore the information on the worldstadia.com, is out of date. I can see why people get fed up with wikipedia - I may not return Jowaninpensans (talk) 20:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removing maintenance tag without improving the article, or no good reason on talk or edit summery is generally looked as vandalizing effort.
You do not need to mention where I'm from (if you do so, it is regarded that, you may be looking down upon me). I'm proudly from BD and adhere to policies on Wikipedia.
Your comment “article is original” rises the question of WP:OR:P
Checked copyvio claim of bot. Removing. (norm is the same editor, who's edit caused the inclusion of copyvio tag might not remove the tag - some other editor should erify and remove) » nafSadhdidsay 06:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
