Talk:Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse

Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 13, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Horse breeds task force.

United States: Kentucky Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 09:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll take on this review, though I'm not too familiar with man-made breeds of animals, that might in fact be a good thing (so you can get objective views). FunkMonk (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would be good to separate the registration info from the characteristics info, as in Azteca horse?
Maybe add one more image[1], to show the range in colouration? The head profile is also shown better there.
Some of the terminology is a bit hard to follow for the uninitiated, but I guess that's what wikilinks are for. But maybe it could be mentioned that "geldings" are castrated, since the term is used quite a few times?
I'm not sure if the word "excellent" is appropriate, isn't it a bit subjective? "and make excellent trail mounts in rugged terrain." Maybe say they are regarded as such, instead of saying they are?
That's it from me, sources for both text and images look good. FunkMonk (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, FunkMonk! I definitely appreciate reviews from non-horse people, as they help catch things (like jargon) that fly right past me. I think I've addressed all of your comments above. I don't really like any of the pictures in the article, but there isn't anything better on Commons or free online :( Oh well, hopefully one of these days someone will upload something better... Thanks again, and please let me know if there's anything else that needs work. Dana boomer (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I have no more issues, passed! FunkMonk (talk) 15:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:American Paint horse which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130629152312/http://imh.org/index.php/exhibits/online/horse-breeds-of-the-world/north-america/item/2168-kentucky-mountain-saddle-horse to http://imh.org/index.php/exhibits/online/horse-breeds-of-the-world/north-america/item/2168-kentucky-mountain-saddle-horse

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]