Talk:Kenneth I. Starr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Other sources[edit]

Other editors might want to extract from this:

  • Lauria, Peter (2010-05-28). "The Pole Dancer and the Ponzi Scheme". The Daily Beast.

Lauria makes the case that the motive for the fraud was his infatuation and indulgence with Diane. When I can locate the indictment, it might confirm this. patsw (talk) 01:35, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Patsw: From reading cited articles, I got the impression that despite what the prosecutor said, Starr's infatuation with Diane was not the beginning of his embezzlement and fraud. I was looking for his birth date, which is normally on indictments, and found the indictment linked as a PDF file on a Wall Street Journal article. Unfortunately, neither that copy of the indicitment nor a subsequent one showed the birth date. The federal inmate locator register shows him as being 72 y/o currently, so he was born in 1943 or 1944. I wasn't sure how to treat that, so did my best. After I cleaned up much of the article, an anonymous user changed my edits to note that Starr was in a halfway house. I couldn't find a citation for that, but I presume the edits were done by someone with interest in and/or personal knowledge of the case, so I left that contention as it stands. Also, the indictment named Starr's son, referred to on the indictment as Ron Star (sic) Bristol. Because Bristol the last name on the indictment, that's how the PDF is identified. I don't have much time to fiddle with it, so I left it in much better shape than I found it, but the article still obviously needs work. Lastly, I don't know if Ron had to plead guilty and what the sentence might have been. The article makes an odd comparison (which could be deleted), of the situation with Ron and the sons of Bernie Madoff, whose sons it claims were not prosecuted. Actually, one died of illness and the other committed suicide. I've put too much time into this article already. Ugh. Now I've discovered still another possible error in the article and I'll fix that too. The quality of the Vanity Fair source article is atrocious tabloidism. Activist (talk) 07:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • You cannot imagine how little I care about this at this point. patsw (talk) 23:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kenneth I. Starr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]