Talk:Kennecott Utah Copper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I bet it's pretty crazy to live in Utah.

Well obviously, it is the promised land after all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.213.217.46 (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I KNOW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.115.39 (talk) 22:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the controversy regarding Kennecot? I read a sentence on another website that mentioned Bophal India and Kennecot as examples of "ugly American" -ism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.44.6.132 (talk) 14:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was this show on the Science Channel today where they were saying something about Kennecott. I was half asleep, but it sounded pretty impressive. If you say Utah backwards, it sounds like you're sneezing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.98.5 (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just discovered this page, it has really changed my life. I encourage everyone to discover the wonders of Kennecott Utah Copper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.34.133.138 (talk) 02:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New history resource[edit]

This mining history account has good historical info re both Utah Copper & Kannecott. In particular, this chart documents the Guggenheim-controlled mines & smelters as of 1910. The Googs owned Kennecott and controlled Utah Copper then -- needs to be added to article. "Although the Guggenheims held only a minority interest in UCCo., by virtue of the smelting contract they were in control."

Too late for now, --Pete Tillman (talk) 06:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1973 Chilean Coup?[edit]

I noticed that a few pages direct here, but that this page seems a friendly whitewash. According to some other pages around wiki, this company had an office bombed in the 1970s in revenge for supposed support during the 1973 Chilean coup. Bahb the Illuminated (talk) 07:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental concerns[edit]

Information here: [1]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.mining-technology.com/projects/bingham/bingham2.html
    Triggered by \bmining-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kennecott Utah Copper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]