Talk:Kautokeino rebellion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removing Reference about Capital Punishment[edit]

Hi Eilev G. Myhren - I friendly-reverted/removed your paragraph only because it was slightly off-topic and not directly related to the Uprising itself. Maybe you should start a page on Norwegian Capital Punishment as it is a relevant topic to Norwegian History. What we need are some solid sources for the page. Compare and contrast of different rebellions would be doing individual research Take Care... Dinkytown (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed[edit]

One will note that the existing law prescribing capital punishment at the time dated back to 1685. The 1814 constitution had not changed it. Capital punishment was not removed from Norwegian jurisdiction for another 30 years. The ruling body at the time was still a relic from the Dano-Norwegian union, and it is fair to say that the Sami rebels were punished the same way as Norwegian rebels would have been a hundred years before. In fact, Norwegian rebellions had been far more violent in their time.

Article is nonsense[edit]

The "rebellion" was in fact a manifestation of religious madness brought on by a small sect started by three brothers who believed they were Jesus Christ and God himself. It was a Sami on Sami conflict as they thought to convert by violence the others to their sect. This was admitted later in court by the leaders. Trying to spin it as a rebellion against authorities goes against everything the sources say. 80.197.107.218 (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Rebellion" is the term generally used to describe the event. See [1].--Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kautokeino rebellion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]