Talk:Katy Perry/GA3

GA Reassessment[edit]

Delisted. — ΛΧΣ21™ 05:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Katy Perry GA: not really

GA status is not worthy anymore; Katy Perry article needs a reassessment the references are atrocious, which violates and fails criteria #2 of WP:GACR. There are barely publishers given AdabowtheSecond (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please elaborate your comment AdabowtheSecond, since what you say is not on the GA criteria. Publishers are not required. And what do you mean with "atrocious"? remember to give solutions, not problems. Regards. —Hahc 21 03:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this is an individual reassessment, which means that you must reassess the article against the criteria. Please remember to carefully read WP:GAR. If you need help, just ask me. I'd be glad to help. —Hahc 21 03:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I must have been mistaken then, an other editor told me that publishers are necessarily to meet GA, I have no further problems with the article. Sorry for the inconvenience, still learning. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 13:03, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Adabow. I have checked the article and it actually doesn't meet several criteria, so i think i will eventually delist it. I will take a look at it for some time before delisting it (if i finally do it). —Hahc 21 01:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Has a decision been made? AIRcorn (talk) 03:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will delist the article. References and prose need work to be up to standard again. — ΛΧΣ21™ 04:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.