Talk:Kashi Math

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 22 February 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Notability concerns

Untitled[edit]

It contains info regarding the kashi mutt one of the mutts followed by brahmins in India. It has history details. Links and also the diety and guru names.

Please block the user Granuator from editing this page. He is twisting the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajithrshenoy (talk • contribs) 06:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Granuator, Don't just change the article. Support it by facts. Admins, Please block this user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajithrshenoy (talk • contribs) 09:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained uncited and unverified edits by Granuator[edit]

Hi Granuator, Kindly Discuss with us before you make an UNDO in Kashi Math. I have added the latest information regarding the Kashimath. All material I have added are referenced with suitable verifiable sources.

Kindly discuss with me, why you making UNDO?

Regards.. Spedian (talk) 07:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

User:Granuator this message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kashi Math. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —--PremKudva^Talk 10:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Reverting Duplicate , unexplained uncited and unverified Edit[edit]

Hi Granuator, Wikipedia Admins already gave you final Warning. Still you are adding duplicate, unexplained, uncited and unverified contents to Wikipedia Page Kashi Math. From all above your intention is clear that you again wants disruptive editing and vandalism..

The New Content Internal Strife you are added are already exist in the page. Dont add Duplicate contents.

Kindly please stop editing Kashi Math by unexplained uncited and unverified Edit

Regards Spedian (talk) 18:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I'm not finding many sources for this subject, and most that do exist seem to be either self-published, unreliable caste association websites and news items relates to the succession court case. It's not even clear exactly what the thing is. Does it really meet our notability requirements?

Kashi Math is notable subject and have many Sources in Internet. http://www.asklaila.com/listing/Bangalore/Malleswaram/Sri+Kashi+Mutt/1A3bUOpw/ http://theflightofgods.wordpress.com/category/kashi-math/ http://www.balajisevasamiti.org/our-mutts/sri-kashimutt/ http://www.gosripuram.org/photo-gallery/Kashi-Math-Guru-Parampara.html http://www.kashimath.org/guru-parampara/ http://kashimath.in/category/guru-parampara So Please Remove the Notability Tag from the Pgae. Regards Sanatan2014 (talk) 10:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained and uncited edits[edit]

If no source provided, the below content shall be deleted.

Later, because of the pressures made by the coterie surrounding him (Sudheendra Theertha), He initiated another vatu into sanyasa and named him as Samyamindra Thirtha on 20 June 2002 which created a dilemma in the community. This was against the unchangeable amendment made by the 17th Pontiff, Shrimad Bhuvanendra Tirtha in order to avoid some conflicts happened in Kashi Math. As per this Amendment Mathadhipathi of Kashi Math can initiate only one vatu into Sanyasa and he will be the Shishya Swamiji and the Utharadhikari of the Math. Mathadhipathi of kashi math cannot initiate more than one vatu into sanyasa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajithrshenoy (talk • contribs) 08:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Murder[edit]

I've removed the section about a murder that took place at the math. Yes, it involved an employee but it really doesn't seem to be relevant to the math itself. If, for example, the motive for murder had been a dispute relating to the succession then it might serve a useful purpose but that does not seem to be the case. - Sitush (talk) 19:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia etc[edit]

The content here, and in particular in its table, is mostly trivia of the most specious kind. Worse, much of it isn't actually verified by the sources, where sources are given at all. One person has been repeatedly reinstating the stuff for months, if not years. They need to stop. - Sitush (talk) 08:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a directory[edit]

I have just reverted the article. There was misuse of honorific titles and formatting, peacock wording such as "beautiful" and a massive problem with WP:NOTDIRECTORY and sourcing. If any of the other maths are notable then create sourced articles for them and perhaps consider creating an appropriate category that can contain all of them. - Sitush (talk) 17:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kashi Math. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]