Talk:K-3 (Kansas highway)

K-3 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 3, 2013. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-3 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 17:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
In the route description, you begin two consecutive sentences with "North of". One of these should be changed.
Yeah, I used that transition too often. Fixed.

The sentence "After this intersection, the highway crosses the Little Osage River, then leaves Bourbon County and enters Linn County." sounds awkward. I would remove the mention of leaving Bourbon County because by stating it is entering Linn County, you are already implying it is leaving the previous county mentioned.
Rewritten.

"By 1950, the portion of K-3 in Crawford County had been paved, leaving the remainder of the route yet to be improved" I don't see the need for the rest of the sentence after the comma since that is already implied.
I guess that is pretty redundant. Axed.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Can some more historical details be added to the lead?
Did the best I can. There's not the greatest amount of history on this.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few small fixes to be made. Dough 48 72 17:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have addressed all of your issues. T C N7JM 20:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 21:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]