Talk:Kösem Sultan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Origin[edit]

According to most Turkish sources she was of Bosnian (or Serbian) origin. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I KNOW THAT HURREM (ROXALANE) WAS THE MOST POWERFUL SULTAN IN OTTOMAN EMPIRE[edit]

Wasn't she? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.236.129.137 (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. Hürrem was an influential woman. But of course, the most powerful name was her husband, Suleyman I. Kösem on the other hand was a widow after 28 years of age. After 1617 she saw the reigns of two almost crazy sultans (Mustafa I and İbrahim) and two minors (Murat IV and Mehmet IV) She was unrivalled real ruler of the empire several times between 1617-1651. (except during the reigns of Osman II and grown up Murat IV ) Hürrem never had this opportunity. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hurrem Was Never That Strong. Eventually In 1534s She Just Ruled Harem like Average Womans in The Sultanate (Mihrimah,Nurbanu And Handan) Until 1553 While Kosem Had Eventually The Best Reign Ever. Remember That Safiye Sultan Was also an Grandmother. But She Got Exiled. But Kosem Never did. 78.190.152.109 (talk) 08:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Reverting and rewording citations[edit]

Anonymous user 78.179.176.237 (talk) is vandalizing the article and rewording existing sourced material to suit her own WP:POV [1], like it or not, the references you reworded respect WP:RS, and altering reliably sourced material is considered vandalism in Wikipedia. Please seek consensus for each of your removals first or they will be reverted and try to discuss changes rather than engaging in an edit war.- Best regards Prefamilile (talk) 22:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


RE : 78.179.176.237 is Zafer From istanbul is preparing thesis about Turkish History the most data written on the page was fictions rather than scientific data, obsessive and distorting on Official Ottoman History. The most powerful woman of Ottoman empire, KOSEM SULTAN WAS NOT, if emperiors considered it is Fatih Sultan Mehmet. This is not for the personel comments missionaries but history science.


I have discovered that two of the sources used have indeed been reworded (by replacing the word ‘Greek’ for ‘Bosnian’) in order to portray Kosem as a Bosnian instead of Greek, the real citations:

Source 1 - Amila Buturović, İrvin Cemil Schick (2007). ‘Women in the Ottoman Balkans: gender, culture and history.’ p. 23 explains that :

" Kosem, who was of Greek origin. Orphaned very young, she found herself at the age of fifteen in the harem of Sultan Ahmed."

Source 2 - Singh, Nagendra Kr (2000). International encyclopaedia of Islamic dynasties. Anmol Publications PVT. p. ‘423–424’, explains in more detail that:

" KOSEM WALIDE or KOSEM SULTAN, called Mahpaykar (ca. 1589-1651), wife of the Ottoman sultan Ahmad I and mother of the sultans Murad IV and Ibrahim I [q.vv.]. She was Greek by birth, and achieved power in the first place through the harem, exercising a decisive influence in the state during the reigns of her two sons and of her grandson Mehemmed IV"

These cites have been corrected. Zorlusert (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see the major subject of dispute is her origin. ( I deduce this from the history of the page) She was either a Bosnian-Serbian or a Greek. The origins of the slave girls were never certain. Not only that, even the mothers of some sultans (e.g. Mustafa I and Mahmut II) are not known for sure. On the other hand the question who was the most influenced seems rather meaningless. Nobody can compare the influences in different circumstances and in different ages. If Kösem were the wife of say Selim I probably we wouldn’t even know her name. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


But we know name of Mustafa I and Mahmud II's mothers. They are Halime Sultan and Naksidil Sultan.There is reasonable certainty in this regard and widespread historical consensus.


(88.242.236.114 (talk) 07:56, Oliveoil. (UTC))Was'nt she sent by Bosnia Beylerbeyi from Bosnia ?
However there were many new claims reverted not only she was Greek (Not Rûm), even her father was a saint from Tinos... easy is Turks somehow was'nt cared their history.

Blows influence On Ottoman History etc. paid movies.[edit]

What makes you to consider she was the most powerful woman of the ottoman history, multicultural Eu?.(88.242.236.114 (talk) 07:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Picture.[edit]

Haseki Mahpeyker Kösem Valide Sultan was the most powerful woman in Ottoman history. She was the wife (most likely married) of Sultan Ahmed I. And she was mother of Sultan Murad IV and Sultan Ibrahim I. Also she was mother of Sultan Ahmed's 3 children another from Murad and Ibrahim. Kösem Mahpeyker was the manager of the Ottoman Empire from 1623 to 1633 but in other times, especially in Osman II's and Ibrahim I's reign, she was very influential too. She had such a big power that other sultans couldn't had. She was known as "Valide-i Muazzama" (which means Huge Mother), Sahibet-ül Makam (which means owner of chair) She was known as very charitable and helpful sultan by the community. The community was loving her so much. So, it must be a photograph of her. English Wikipedia is quite professional and it must be like that in its every title. Someone must upload her photograph urgently.

~~meltemtskn~~

Picture.[edit]

Haseki Mahpeyker Kösem Valide Sultan was the most powerful woman in Ottoman history. She was the wife (most likely married) of Sultan Ahmed I. And she was mother of Sultan Murad IV and Sultan Ibrahim I. Also she was mother of Sultan Ahmed's 3 children another from Murad and Ibrahim. Kösem Mahpeyker was the manager of the Ottoman Empire from 1623 to 1633 but in other times, especially in Osman II's and Ibrahim I's reign, she was very influential too. She had such a big power that other sultans couldn't had. She was known as "Valide-i Muazzama" (which means Huge Mother), Sahibet-ül Makam (which means owner of chair) She was known as very charitable and helpful sultan by the community. The community was loving her so much. So, it must be a photograph of her. English Wikipedia is quite professional and it must be like that in its every title. Someone must upload her photograph urgently.

~~meltemtskn~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meltemtskn (talkcontribs) 19:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You use the name "Constantinople" but this name was until 1453. The official name was since 1453 Kostantiniyye or sometimes İstanbul. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_Istanbul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.109.105.99 (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The other female regent[edit]

The text states that two women in the history of the Ottoman Empire ruled officially as regents. One was Kösem Sultan, so who was the other one?

Likely Nurbanu Sultan, Selim II's wife. --Ukas (talk) 09:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Nope the other one was Turhan Hatice Sultan, wife of the Sultan Ibrahim I and mother of the Sultan Mehmed IV. She ordered Kösem's strangulation and took her place after her death Enginmoo (talk) 14:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kösem behind the dethronement and execution of Ibrahim[edit]

Quite a few sources mention Kösem taking part of two attempts to depose her son sultan Ibrahim, of which the latter was successfull. Also several sources claim, that Kösem authorized or agreed on the execution of Ibrahim - even though he was pressured to do so by other parties in power. For example, in Honored by the Glory of Islam: Conversion and Conquest in Ottoman Europe by Marc David Baer (pp.36, citating 18th century text: "Karaçelebizade, Ravzatü’l-ebrâr zeyli, 12–13, 25.") "She articulated the fact that only she could make the final decision concerning who sat on the throne and whether the sultan lived or died: “They said my son Ibrahim was not suitable for the sultanate. I said ‘depose him.’ They said his presence is harmful, I said ‘let him be removed.’ I said ‘let him be executed.’ If anyone is under my protection, it is my son.”" Caroline Finkel, in Osman's Dream (pp. 189) writes: "All are united in the opinion that the Sultan must be deposed; it is impossible to do otherwise. You tell me that if I don’t hand over the Prince, they will enter the palace and take him by force." It was a measure of the authority which had accrued to the figure of the sultan’s mother, and to the present queen-mother in particular, that it was considered necessary to win her over before the Sheikhulislam could deliver his opinion. Although she could write to the Grand Vezir privately of her true feelings, in the company of the statesmen convention required that she appear to resist them. Fearing that attempts might be made to restore İbrahim, another juridical opinion was sought regarding his subsequent execution. " Also, Selcuk Aksin Somel in The A to Z of the Ottoman Empire suggest that she authorized his execution. --Ukas (talk) 13:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a debate going on about this issue. There is no clear evidence about any possible intervention of Kösem on Ibrahim's death. But there is clear evidence showing that Kösem protected Ibrahim when Murat IV ordered his death. Enginmoo (talk) 14:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ref-bombing[edit]

I would suggest that we strip some of the superfluous sources that refer to her Greek origin, as this is undisputed.--Zoupan 05:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Not one source on the page says she was of Bosnian origin[edit]

In my experience there were never any Bosnians in Tinos. The confusion seems to come from the fact she was bought as a slave in Bosnia after being captured in Tinos by Venetians. Easy to correct. 90.244.11.178 (talk) 10:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kösem Sultan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Mahpeyker Sultan[edit]

Kösem was just a nick name and not the personal name. So the page should be renamed to Mahpeyker Sultan. User:Retrieverlove (Talk) 06:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point or it can be mahpeyker Kösem sultan Faris murad (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that name is in wide use, Leslie Peirce uses Kösem Seraphimsystem (talk) 21:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname or not, it's her common name as sources use this name and Turkish people also refer to her as Kösem Sultan. Keivan.fTalk 11:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another version of Kosem's place of birth[edit]

TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi says that Kosem was probably from Bosnia. While Tinos remains the most accepted version, the Bosnia hypothesis should also be added as well. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.190.213.216 (talk) 07:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kefalonia Island Syariff Hakim 90 (talk) 03:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ MÜCTEBA İLGÜREL, "KÖSEM SULTAN", TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/kosem-sultan (20.01.2021).

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kosem's children[edit]

The entire section of the children should be rearranged, since, as for other Ottoman spouses, there is no consensus on the children, the number of which varies from 6 to 11 depending on the historian. Aise, Fatma, Handaze, Murad, Kasin and Ibrahim are universally considered sons of Kosem. Mehmed does not yet have universal consensus because Leslie Pierce excludes it, but modern research has shown him to be the son of Kosem and it is the most popular thesis. Gevherhan and Suleyman are very divisive, with some scholars arguing, with evidence worthy of reflection, that they were in fact the youngest daughter of Mahfiruz (the mother of Osman II) and the son of an unknown concubine or of Mahfiruz own. Finally, in a contemporary letter, a certain Selim and Orhan are mentioned as sons of Kosem. However, the lack of other sources and the failure to mention Kosem's other certain children already born cast doubt on their existence, with some historians believing these to be the middle names of Kasin and Ibrahim, but not all agree. I think the list needs to be rearranged to show these controversies. 31.156.255.6 (talk) 09:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because both Selim and Orhan died in infancy, it's impossible to determine whether they were her children, but given the time gap between 1609 and 1612, it's possible. It is exceedingly perilous for Mehmed to rely on a single widely trusted source; the same can be said for Atike Sultan, who was born in 1614, the same year as Kasim. Kösem's biological daughter, Ayse Sultan, was born the same year as Mehmed, and both Ahmed and Kösem married in the same year. None of these four possible candidates could be considered because they are all controversial. Thank you. Jacob Historian (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kösem and Mehmed[edit]

Why so much resistance to the inclusion of Mehmed among the sons of Kosem? I KNOW Pierce ruled it out, but history, especially Ottoman genealogy, is subject to change. The most modern and currently considered work in the field by exoerts is Baki Tezcan's "Debut of Kosem's Political Career" where he successfully demonstrates, using a new set of documents, sources and evidence, that Kosem was indeed Mehmed's mother. Tezcan is a respected university professor and expert in Ottoman history and his work, such as that on Mahfiruz, has convinced most of his colleagues. I believe that Wikipedia does not say fossilize due to the stubbornness of its editors and that it is therefore necessary to add, perhaps with notes, this new piece of the puzzle. If there is consent, I can provide the page note myself. Sira Aspera (talk) 10:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage[edit]

Good evening,Kosem Sultan was never a legal wife,the letter that O. Kumrular found this means the letter was written 6 years after Sultan Ahmed’s death.Which means it was definitely not written by 12 year old Murad at the time.Kumrular does mention this document but she doesn’t say in orphan word she thinks its 100% convincing and authentic evidence,in fact she herself points out that apart from this one sentence nothing else in the world can justify their marriage.Kumrular HERSELF points out that it is possible that Kosem only wanted to increase her prestige,Historian Erhan Afyoncu also believes Kosem dictated the letter.Apart from the letter full of uncertainties nothing proves that marriage took place,its not mentioned anywhere. Cecac (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]