Talk:Köçek

Tags[edit]

Put a NPOV and POV-check tag. This: "The köçek phenomenon (plural köçekler in Turkish) is considered to be one of the most significant and disturbing feature of Ottoman Empire culture." is pure OR and POV. There are no references to back up this large claim.Baristarim 01:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find it disturbing, at least. - MSTCrow 07:41, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was vandalism, has been cleaned up. Haiduc 20:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rakkas means dancer in Turkish. Male or female. Used here as only male. It is not true usage in Turkish.

Thanks. Haiduc 20:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It' not true that they were employed as an entertainer and sex worker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.3.50.254 (talk) 11:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christians?[edit]

Where is the source that köçek were mainly Christian boys? Feminine lifestyle for boys is forbidden by the Bible. Unlike in post-Islamic cultures like Persia and Ottoman Empire these things were not allowed in Christian communities. So please present a source or it is not true!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.97.241.30 (talk) 07:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kuchak, meaning citation[edit]

I added missing citation to a right data that the meaning of "kuchak" in Persian. But the link takes you an Turkish etymology dictionary which do not have language choice option. Is that a problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KCCan (talk • contribs) 19:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kocek[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: opposed by all genuine unblocked editors Kotniski (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Köçek → kocek –

in its initial article Kocek in English.-Karbont (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Uncontroversial name, move to Kocek. --Karbont (talk) 12:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but I Oppose this move. The majority of learned English-language sources cited in the article use the existing spelling. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No brainer oppose, per Justlettersandnumbers. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 06:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Right, this is nonsense... -Karbont (talk) 10:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is surely a controversial name; must be moved as Köçek → kocek immediately, too cause confusion; and I dont know why we are still talking about this. --Balkanstyle (talk) 21:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Karbont (talk · contribs) and Balkanstyle (talk · contribs) have been blocked as sockpuppets. —innotata 18:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Köçek → kocek - per confusion -- 83.235.21.132 (talk) 13:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC) :The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. [reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Köçek. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160304073208/http://www.ibnistan.net/sarkescinselk/sark2.html to http://www.ibnistan.net/sarkescinselk/sark2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

False reference to citation and false information[edit]

"...they were recruited from among the ranks of the non-Muslim subject nations of the empire, such as Jews, Romani, Greeks.[6] ..."

The source used has no reference of the ethnicities references here, nor does it say that the were non-muslims. 49.184.197.142 (talk) 13:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find this so presumably someone has removed it Chidgk1 (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Women and Gender in the Middle East[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 14 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Geeah86, NavBaruch2022 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by EmPatch (talk) 03:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]