Talk:Justin Hartley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Justin Hartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110827115010/http://www.cwtv.com/shows/smallville/cast/justin-hartley to http://www.cwtv.com/shows/smallville/cast/justin-hartley
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://it.eonline.com/news/watch_with_kristin/smallville_season_eight_look_whos_in/4385
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.streamys.org/nominees-winners/2009-nominees/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://cdn.emmyonline.org/day_43rd_nominations.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Justin Hartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091213043833/http://redcanyonmovie.com/home/utah-calls-red-canyon-too-controversial to http://redcanyonmovie.com/home/utah-calls-red-canyon-too-controversial

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life[edit]

The source used for a third marriage looked like classic synthesis: They've been seen out together, they've been spotted sporting rings on their ring fingers, we've been told by an unnamed source, ergo they must have got married. No actual proof of this conclusion was provided. BLP requires better sourcing for statements like this. Nthep (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after legal threats leading to a block, we still end up with a decent result. I guess the user's "legal team" will be stoked to have missed out on their fee for this one. Thanks for evaluating the source, @Nthep. ⁓ Pelagic ( messages ) 02:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found this discussion after the marriage was removed from the infobox. If the information is unreliable then surely it shouldn't be in either the infobox or personal life section? CountessCobra (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Us Weekly should never be used for something like this. Even the original People article apparently does not confirm the marriage. The best that could be done with this is "It has been reported that..." but for BLP info like this, that is likely a poor way to go. Unless and until there is some follow-up reporting or social media posting confirming they are married, this needs to stay out of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

People does seem to confirm their marriage: Hartley was first linked to Pernas in June 2020, and they got married in May 2021. Also E Online: Days after E! News confirmed their marital status, Justin Harley and Sofia Pernas stepped out... and Entertainment Tonight Justin Hartley Shows His Love for 'Beautiful' Wife Sofia Pernas in Birthday Post, which references an Instagram post. Per WP:RSP, People is considered to be a reasonable source. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: Thanks for that! That recent People source was just the kind of "confirmatory" source that I think we were looking for, as the original People source from several months ago wasn't conclusive on the question. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]