Talk:Juno Temple

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The main image of Juno Temple[edit]

could the picture on this page look any more unflattering? the girl is hot, the pic sucks... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.171.106.103 (talk) 02:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had to come on here to comment about that as well. I love Wikipedia, this article gets over a 1000 hits a day[1] yet we only have one photo of her, because someone "gave it" to the project and compared with her fellow actors, she looks like she's having a shit [2] poor girl. Ryan4314 (talk) 19:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Having no picture is better than that one. 71.77.19.7 (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I too came in here just to make that remark. Do we have a big enough mob yet to take action?99.37.216.64 (talk) 02:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea we can remove/hide it, if everyone prefers no picture instead of that one. Ryan4314 (talk) 11:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I chose that photo to ask to have relicensed as Wiki-friendly as it was the one I felt could be used in the most places on Wikipedia. Who knows, maybe one of his other images might be more suitable - from this set or this set? (Mind you, the license would need to changed first...) Tabercil (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And there's a new image present which we can use and is now present. Tabercil (talk) 23:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the girl is hot, we need a new picture please! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.172.11.115 (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree. Though looks are no matter for Wikipedia articles, I feel the facial expression she's making strongly contrasts some of the common images you'll find of her on Google. In other words, there's better photos of her – ones that resemble her a lot more adequately. The issue is that we need to find a photo of her that isn't copyrighted, which can take time and research, and sometimes even conversations with the owner! Hopefully an experiences Wikipedia user can complete this task soon, since everyone's in favor of a new photo! -- AlexanderHovanec (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^This is a wiki, yes you can remove the picture. Anyone can![edit]

"Removing the picture per the general consensus on talk page. Just saw Kaboom and this picture seems like it could be vandalism / malicious."

The old picture for safe keeping. Sorry, I'm not finding a new one. You're welcome --67.54.192.38 (talk) 02:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you looked on Commons and also back in the history of the article we already have a different one available... which I've added. Tabercil (talk) 03:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Juno Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main image[edit]

Seems like a strange choice. You can't even see her face. Surely there is a photo available with her actual face visible? 70.178.58.115 (talk) 11:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]