Talk:Judith Sargentini

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy section[edit]

The text as it stands entirely depends on a tiny, strongly POV source. And the claim (presented as fact) that the information was "well available" is contradicted by readily accessible reports. On top of that the source refers to the former suspect Abdelmajid Touil, whose guilt hasn't been proven and who has been later released for lack of evidence. Citing him, even indirectly, as evidence " of Muslims Jihadists travelling with, or disguised as, immigrants to the European Union" seems to presume him guilty. I suggest that the current content is removed and that the section will be either filled with sourceable, relevant controversial material or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.229.168.165 (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judith Sargentini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judith Sargentini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Balancing opinions stated in the article on the Article 7 report[edit]

Concerned with the tone of the article (see latest version before my edition today at 16h29) which very strangely echoed Orban government's attacks on Judith Sargentini and her report, I took the liberty to write counter opinions under the concerned part. I added an element proving that she has been at the center of a smearing campaign.

You will note that I have not deleted a single of the previous arguments against her, apart from some nuancing. I have been careful as to not have my edits labelled a conflict of interest as I am currently working as administrative staff for the European Parliament.

I trust the regular editors to edit and remove in order to bring as much neutrality to this page as possible. NoeudGordien (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]