Talk:Joseph "Mad Dog" Taborsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph "Mad Dog" Taborsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues[edit]

A 2007 article with 157 edits and a problem that should be self-evident. The article has zero citations having three links in the "External links" section apparently as source. Many articles seem to have started out this way, because there is not a lot of mention on Wikipedia about citing sources or NPOV but, of the three two are photographs. One is a NY Daily News article that would certainly be considered reliable. A problem is that even sourced it is still questionable if this article passes the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. It does have a couple of interesting trivia mentions.
As it stands now, in the present condition and lack of verification, and the only infamy being a string of murders and a subject being put to death, there has surely not been any interest in sourcing the article or expanding it. The notability of the subject is questioned.
Does this string of actions, being murders and an execution, actually propel the subject to be more notable than Louis Wolfson, Edward Kurpewski, Daniel Janowski, Samuel Cohn, John M. Rosenthal, and Bernard "Buster" Speyer and Ruth Speyer. These are victims and if the "events" were notable enough why not name the article something like the Mad Dog Murders. Otr500 (talk) 00:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]