Talk:John Rutsey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neil Peart[edit]

I take issue with part of this sentence: "His replacement, Neil Peart ended up being one of the most respected drummers and lyricists of all time." I doubt that anyone would argue with Peart as a highly respected drummer. But his over-blown lyrics are more often an object of ridicule than scorn. He's certainly an abitious lyricist, but that ambition rarely pays off for him. He may be admired in prog-rock circles, but he is not generally respected as a lyricist, as far as I know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wheat (talk • contribs)

I would question very strongly the above statement. Peart criticizes himself for some of his earlier material from the 1970s, but lyrically speaking, most critics have given credit to Rush's varied songwriting approach. At least they never stooped to writing graphic sex lyrics, or employing morally questionable themes. Even Rolling Stone Magazine, one of Rush's most notable detractors, paid compliments to Neil Peart's lyrical talent in their reviews of "Grace Under Pressure," "Power Windows," and "Presto."

Beside this page was supposed to be about John Rutsey, whose drumming talents were perfect for Led Zeppelinesque blues-rock -- but not for the progressive rock that Rush would purvey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.182.123.51 (talk • contribs)

Neil Peart is considered one of the greatest lyricists of all time to anyone who has bothered to actually read his work. His novels have also appeared on best seller lists, further indicating not only his genius, but his ability to connect with the masses. The most poignant, if unlikely, tribute comes from the fact that the author of the first paragraph has gone so far as to very nearly quote Peart's lyrics in the very sentence that most disparages them!

"So often fragile power turns to scorn and ridicule." - Neil Peart, "Emotion Detector" from the album "Power Windows" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esroberto (talk • contribs)

Dear Esroberto - I have bothered to actually read the man's work, and I find it to be utter crapola. Similar atrocious writers such as Dan Brown and Danielle Steele can also be found on best seller lists. These are (a few) things for you to remember before you speak for others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.236.178 (talk) 20:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

keeping Peart material on-topic[edit]

  • The "blessing-in-disguise" wording is unnecessarily dismissive of Rutsey; and anyway the subject of how respected or talented Neil Peart may be (I'm pretty impartial on the issue) is off-topic on this page. What would be relevant is that Peart's writing and drumming style became some of the band's dominant and popular characteristics, and Rutsey's departure cleared the path. I'm swapping that in, but feel free to reword the paragraph (especially for conciseness) as long as the divisive, subjective, and mostly off-topic issue of Peart's greatness is not re-introduced. Further consideration of Neil Peart really belongs on the pages for Neil Peart or Rush. – edgarde 17:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Incidentally, the "blessing-in-disguise"[1] paragraph is mostly duplicated from the Rush (album) page, which needs a similar rewrite just for the dismissive tone (which can be read as disrespectful toward Rutsey). – edgarde 18:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm also removing the {{fact}} tag as opinions on Peart's influence are adequately linked on the Rush and Peart pages. Also removing the Peart album count (an updating nuisance) because Rutsey isn't involved with those albums. – edgarde 18:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture?[edit]

Is it necessary or would it be a bother if I decided to add a picture of John when he was with the band? RIPLIUKANG (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not worth the trouble, unless you know of a free use (or otherwise GFDL-compatible) image of Rutsey. A previous picture was deleted, probably over fair use issues. / edg ☺ ☭ 06:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. I'll leave it be. RIPLIUKANG (talk) 07:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I now think it would be a fitting tribute in the light of John's death to include a picture on his page. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.243.4 (talk • contribs) 12:23, May 15, 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Rutsey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Rutsey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

absolutely this is opinion & not fit for the article, but...[edit]

...this is rush with rutsey a few months before he left, & while you can sense that he would have held them back as the writing got more ambitious, they also lost the swing evident here. if you're going to delete this as you swing by tidying pages that you know nothing about, "editors", please remove all that crap about peart's lyrics FIRST. at least this entry is on topic.

[youtube]/Drouhbjp_9c?t=1132

duncanrmi (talk) 12:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Rutsey&oldid=1208145262"