Talk:John L. Hennessy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Free image from Flickr?[edit]

I think I found a free image showing John L. Hennessy at http://www.flickr.com/photos/maveric2003/561604319/ . The person who uploaded the image claims that it shows "Provost John Etchemendy", however I think that this is an incorrect description and the image shows indeed John L. Hennessy. Just compare the photo of John L. Hennessy in his biography[1] and the photo of John Etchemendy at [2]. Do you think the flickr image[3] could be used for this article?--Stacalusa (talk) 04:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's him, alright. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is. Here's an alternate, same day (17 June 2007) and place, just in case you should need it. Both the current image in the article and this one are CC-2.0/by/ which is good. --FeralOink (talk) 07:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

edit war over GSHI.org link[edit]

Please stop reverting each other and discuss the issue, either here or on your talk pages. —Stepheng3 (talk) 13:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another photo[edit]

John Hennessy (left) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanternflash (talkcontribs) 19:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John L. Hennessy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on John L. Hennessy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RISC[edit]

The statement "reduced instruction set computer (RISC) architecture (..) is now used in 99% of new computer chips.[8]" is bold to say the least. I wouldn't trust the new york times or whoever they spoke to on this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.55.186.236 (talk) 04:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]