This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: multi part move completed per talk page consensus below. Feel free to make other subsequent moves as already discussed as well. Tiggerjay (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
– We tend to disambiguate people using occupations rather than membership in a religious group. The meaning of "Puritan" is also not immediately obvious to everyone, and it is frequently misunderstood. I am using ministers as a test case. There are several more members of Category:Puritans who are theologians or other occupations and can be moved in another RM if this one succeeds, and I may have missed some ministers. Please note that "Puritan" is not the most common disambiguator being used in the category. JFH (talk) 03:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Puritan seems more identifiable in this case. Apteva (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've created a couple of these articles, and used what was out there as a model for naming. I agree that minister may be more specific than Puritan, and most people likely have a better understanding of what a minister is, versus a Puritan. For these reasons, I agree that the title change would be appropriate. Also, John Cotton (Puritan) can be added to the list. Sarnold17 (talk) 23:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I left out anyone described as a theologian in the lead because it seems to me that being a theologian usually trumps being a minister in terms of notability, but if you think Cotton is better described as a minister feel free to add him. If this RM succeeds I will do another one with theologians and others. --JFH (talk) 13:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a valid point, but Cotton spent his entire adult life as a minister, and in all the research I've done on him, I've never seen where anyone called or considered him as a theologian. The much noted Roger Williams, on the other hand, did not spend much of his life as a minister, though he was a prolific writer, and had very refined theological ideas. I would stick with minister for Cotton, since that is really what he is known as, despite his scholarship on theological subjects. Sarnold17 (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As an additional argument, I see that proper nouns are to be avoided as parenthetical disambiguators per WP:NCDAB --JFH (talk) 13:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom rationale and Sarnold and observation that "minister" is more common in book sources, at least for the first name. Dicklyon (talk) 01:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
