Talk:John Brodie Innes

A fact from John Brodie Innes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Charles Darwin was a friend of his local vicar, the Reverend John Brodie-Innes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/November.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Move to John Brodie Innes[edit]

All the reliable sources refer to John Brodie Innes, the sole exception being the questionable thePeerage.com which seems unaware of Scottish practice: it also incorrectly shows the Shaw Stewart baronets as Shaw-Stewart. A link I found earlier has died, but see ^{[%5b%5bWikipedia:Link rot|dead link%5d%5d]} "Requirements for Recognition". The Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs. Archived from the original on 13 Mar 2014. It was established in the case of Campbell-Gray, Petitioner in 1950 that no person may bear a compound or double-barrelled surname and be recognised as a Chief {{cite web}}: Check |archiveurl= value (help). The Court of the Lord Lyon has raised issues about the hyphenating of names in various cases, for example in 1965 and 2010. Since good quality sources consistently refer to John Brodie Innes, I propose moving this page to that title. This does not affect John William Brodie-Innes, who clearly published using the hyphenated version of his father's name. . dave souza, talk 13:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the move! . dave souza, talk 18:50, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Brodie Innes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]