Talk:Joffre-class aircraft carrier

Joffre-class aircraft carrier has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 5, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joffre-class aircraft carrier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will review; although it'll be a few days. Hog Farm _Talk 03:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No rush, I need to expand the lede a bit more anyways.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Especially once the Germans began building a carrier of their own in 1936" - sentence fragment
The infobox and body disagree on the speed at which the range could be achieved
Infobox says the deck armor was 40mm to 70 mm, but the body says 30mm to 70mm
Conning tower armor is in the infobox but I'm not seeing it in the body
Image licensing is fine
Sources are all reliable
AGF on source-text integrity given nominator's good reputation and long experience

Hog Farm _Talk 22:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]