This article was nominated for deletion on March 31 2010. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
OK, but I'm sorry a guy who photographed rock stars in the 1970s and 1980s, has had his photos used for covers of noteworthy albums commercially and artistically, has had his work published in noteworthy magazines with nation-wide and global circulation, has had retrospectives of his work at galleries in major American urban centers, and who is also a some time musician, archivist, and producer collaborating on work that is noteworthy, is not noteworthy himself? Sure, the current bio is just a stub, but that only means more work needs to be done. PJtP (talk) 01:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For the most part Wikipedia lets the record speak for itself. Has he, over the years, received substantive coverage (not passing or incidental mentions) in multiple reliable sources independent of the man himself? If so, enough to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, then he qualifies for an article. If not, then we see that fact speaking for itself: he has not, at large, been found notable. Wikipedia is kind of a copycat in that regard: "has he been found notable elsewhere?" is the question, not "do we find him notable based on our own assessment of his life?" —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
