Talk:Jodi Picoult

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

Jodi Picoult's My Sister's Keeper is one of the most interesting books I've read. Lots of my friends have read it on my recommendation, and we all agree it is a book to challenge any parent in this difficult ethical situation. It's very easy to see how a little bit can turn into a lot, and when do you stop?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.217.205.203 (talk) 05:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banned?[edit]

What does "banned by the religious right" mean? More specifics, please. Isoxyl 04:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It means that certain conservative religious groups have banned their constituents from reading that book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.131.114.82 (talk) 16:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LoL, leaders of religions here in the US, and in the West in general, do not have the power to "ban" their followers from doing anything. they can only assert that this or that book is forbidden, but do they even do that? don't they merely say that this or that book is nasty or hateful or filled with sinful behavior? and don't liberal leaders do much the same thing about other books?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.224.120 (talk) 03:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But specifically by whom? I don't think the "banned" thing appears in the article anymore. We can put it back in if we have a citation for it. Otherwise, it's just hearsay. Chrissypan 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hearsay? gee, if it's true, someone could dig up a sourced quote, rather than simply assert that they heard someone say it, which is what "hearsay" means.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.224.120 (talk) 03:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

Someone should remove the links to her books that link to other articles accidentally. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.206.83.152 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 23 March 2007

The link to her UK site needs changing - remove the '-'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.182.253 (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preceded and followed by parameters[edit]

I'm going through and deleting the preceded by and followed by parameters in each individual book article. These parameters don't apply to the books since as far as I know none of the books can be considered a series and the Template:Infobox Book states for those parameters: The preceded_by and followed_by fields both apply to books in a series and to sequels. They should not connect separate books chronologically. --ImmortalGoddezz 19:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I hope nobody minds but I changed the image to something less blurry and where you can actually see her face. This is a photo I took at a book signing of hers in 2007, so it's entirely my own work. Chrissypan (talk) 00:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey sorry Chrissypan, um but does anyone have a better copyright-free image of her? cos this looks well, unprofessional and unglam. Regina marie (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering why some of the books have links and not Mercy-which is a really good one. somebody should write a page on Mercy.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Catthornton (talk • contribs) 15:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a much better image 16352174. Can someone with rights to edit semi-protected pages switch the image? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:16352174.jpg PLEASE! :) Thanks! Damandamythdalegend (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there's a question about the copyright.. --CutOffTies (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Handle With Care[edit]

That needs to be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.203.61 (talk) 02:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

It would help if the article mentioned the genre of her novels; and if the prose were more legato. 110.33.5.16 (talk) 00:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Between The Lines[edit]

Her new book "Between The Lines" needs to be added to the bibliography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.131.74.201 (talk) 03:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no info on what kind of thing that Picoult writes about[edit]

the article gives no info on what kind of thing that Picoult writes about, if she writes SF or detective fiction, history or anthropology, erotica or religious sermons. 03:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC) Michael Christian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.224.120 (talk)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Jodi Picoult. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713111831/http://www.jodipicoult.com/email/2007-12/index.htm to http://www.jodipicoult.com/email/2007-12/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Innacuracy[edit]

In the section where it talks about the CHaD walk, it says that it was in Hanover, Conneticut. However, the town is Hanover, New Hampshire. You can check the source link. I can't edit this page; could someone do it for me? Thanks. iannolon 20:38, 8 May 2017 (EST)

Good catch. I have made the change now that the page is unprotected. Furrykiller (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Jodi Picoult. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002115558/http://www.newenglandbooks.org/Default.aspx?pageId=608673 to http://www.newenglandbooks.org/Default.aspx?pageId=608673

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]