Talk:Jimmy Herring

This article was nominated for deletion on 08 November, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Guitarists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments re: this article[edit]

I first want to thank whomever put a lot of effort into building the text here, and also thank the person responsible for a gorgeous photo! Having said that, there were a few concerns I have had here:

I couldn't find a reference section, so I placed a Notes section. Otherwise, I couldn't reference any of the assertions in the article.
In an encyclopedia, the person is not referred to as "Jimmy", but as "Herring". The only exception might be when siblings have the same surname and a distinction must be made as to who it is. Also, I sensed some Peacock words; some POV in favor of Herring. I didn't remove his accolades, but feel someone should look over the article to check for such things. You can talk of a person's achievements in the introduction, and in the closing in a sort of legacy section, if one is called for, but otherwise, some comments about how a person is outstandingly good at whatever, isn't quite right.
Is it really necessary to name the schoolchildren Herring played with, as none are notable, and nobody but Herring probably cares about his Junior High School music buddies? Almost every guitarist begins with those "annonymous" school bands where they learn their chops. They aren't usually mentioned, unless they continue in that person's career.
I changed the continuous use of future-speak. Like, "2000 would see him creating his own band and playing Tarzan", or, "It would not be the last time he ___" (examples only), but it's a journalistic convention, and should only be used sparingly in Wikipedia I think.
Last, I think more inline citations are seriously needed, there are weasel words I didn't remove or question (yet).--Leahtwosaints (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts. Your points are all good ones. In my opinion if you were to make more changes to the article along the lines you're suggesting, that would be appropriate. — Mudwater^(Talk) 02:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with a'lot of the points made above.........I just copy-edited this article.......I also cleaned up some ref stuff. Although the primary contributor as well as User:Leahtwosaints did some good work/made some good points, I've never understood why people put both a "notes" sections as well as a "references" section.....I think I'll work on that and just pull everything into one references section. Anyway, good efforts on everyone's parts!! Buddpaul (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In some cases, such as this one, the Notes section is for references that are in-line footnotes, and References is for references that are not footnotes. I think that's fine. In general, references are better as footnotes, because that makes it easier to tie specific points in the article to specific references. But a non-footnote reference is a lot better than no reference. — Mudwater^(Talk) 23:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jimmy Herring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]