Talk:Jeung Lai-chuen

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jeung Lai-chuen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interesting...[edit]

...that none of the baying mob demanding that the AFD be reopened actually got around to making a case for deletion. SpinningSpark 11:53, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"baying mob"? That was as orderly and well considered deletion review as I've seen, as noted by the last comment in it. And there is no obligation on anyone to comment in each and every deletion discussion on an article; every discussion is different, and editors may feel their time is better served participating in discussions where they can make a difference or have something new to contribute.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said at the DRV "If you want to challenge Cunard's sources, then fine reopen the debate. But if you just want to reopen the debate because vote counting comes to a different answer that would just be wasting everyone's time." It seems people wanted the second one. Next time I won't cave in to a relist demand so easily. SpinningSpark 14:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeung Lai Chuen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150102120622/http://taipinginstitute.com/menu-styles/ln/pak-mei-kuen to http://taipinginstitute.com/menu-styles/ln/pak-mei-kuen

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]