This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
The "Work" and "Legacy" sections are overwhelmingly based on Johnson's 1844 "Farmer's Encyclopedia", therefore they present a mid-19th century view of crop science. Can someone write an assessment of Tull's work using more modern and comprehensible language? I am fairly sure that this part is flat-out wrong, and one of the agricultural practices that led to the Dust Bowl: "In the driest weather good hoeing procures moisture to the roots of plants, though the ignorant and incurious fancy it lets in the drought." 198.137.18.221 (talk) 20:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
