Talk:Jehoram of Judah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Refers to Rehoboam ?[edit]

The chronology part refers to 'Rehoboam', about a failure in Thiele's chronology. But I can't find any corresponding part in the page "Rehoboam"... Jan3sobieski (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find the 'Rehoboam' reference either, but this snippet from another article seems to give some explaination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_R._Thiele

Thiele was able to reconcile the Biblical chronological data from the books of Kings and Chronicles with the exception of synchronisms between Hoshea of Israel and Hezekiah of Judah towards the end of the kingdom of Israel and reluctantly concluded that at that point the ancient authors had made a mistake. Subsequent writers have proposed an unattested coregency between Hezekia and his father Ahaz to explain the Hoshea/Hezekiah synchronisms. Among these writers are Thiele’s colleague Siegfried Horn,[6] T. C. Mitchell and Kenneth Kitchen,[7] and Leslie McFall.[8]

Wokyjabber (talk) 11:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jehoram of Judah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hiding the contradiction, do we?[edit]

What about 2King.1.17 and 2King.3.1? Now you can't pose this fictional character as a historical figure anymore, as for that it should have started to rule in two years at once! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:AB88:370C:1480:354A:AA5E:5B12:AF43 (talk) 21:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved in the Chronological notes. JohnThorne (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Catherine Emmerich[edit]

If you want to WP:CITE her, then cite her under a section entitled Mysticism. But definitely not in a section about the Bible and definitely not in a section dealing with real-world history. Emmerich-Brentano did not write WP:SCHOLARSHIP, they wrote mysticism. As historiography and Bible scholarship it's just garbage. To put it otherwise, her writings are WP:RS for her own views only (and even that much has been challenged), but not for objective historical facts about the ancient history. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]