Talk:Jean-Pierre Vernant

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled[edit]

The following 'criticism' section removed here: it is evidently designed to attack Vernant's reputation rather than to inform. Charles Matthews 22:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cut from this page; see the page history. Charles Matthews 09:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of shouting a fatwa, why don't you put your too-capable brain to inform me of the specifics? I didn't design it to do this or that, although I (and many, many colleagues) find his reputation overinflated. Regardless, there are no personal remarks, and it is substantiated by references (I did miss one on the last paragraph). If you like him, fine. But there are many people who find his work weak, and since West is one of the most recognizable voices in the field, a section on criticism is fully tenable and appliable. This is done all over wikipedia where there are controversies surrounding a theory or thinker. Being scorned by West and other authorities is thus sufficient. And I won't accept the section being pulled off until every line of criticism is shown to be misguided. Until then, fuck off. 201.19.139.187 23:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts of controversies are quite acceptable, if they are well-sourced and neutral accounts. Saying that his reputation is only high amongst the ill-informed hardly counts as that. Charles Matthews 09:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism in an attempt to damage someone's reputation is libel (see the boxes above). This is especially applicable to the "Stalinist" accusation, which is unsourced and therefore libellous. Your changes are largely attempts to turn this into an article about M.L. West, which is not useful: this is not an exercise in "let's compare every Hellenist to my favourite one". West's views on one of Vernant's books are not notable either; citations that survey all of Vernant's career -- balanced citations -- would be useful. Petrouchka 02:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jean-Pierre Vernant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jean-Pierre Vernant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061201095052/http://www.coe.int/t/e/cultural_co-operation/culture/completed_projects/frontiers/france.asp to http://www.coe.int/t/e/cultural_co-operation/culture/completed_projects/frontiers/france.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]