Talk:Javelina Formation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Paleobiota help[edit]

Code[edit]

This section contains pre-made code that can be copy and pasted into articles containing paleobiota tables. To save space, not all of the code is visible, additional code can be found by simply viewing this section's edit page.

Premade rowspans:

| rowspan="2" |

| rowspan="3" |

| rowspan="4" |

| rowspan="5" |

| rowspan="6" |

| rowspan="7" |

Replacement headings for "Presence" column


! Location
! Stratigraphic position
! Material


Replacement headings for "Taxa" column



Cell background colors[edit]

The background colors of the cells are a means to communicate the relevant organism's taxonomic status.

Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.

Red for reclassified and preoccupied

|style="background:#fbdddb;" |

Purple for taxa falsely reported as present:

|style="background:#f3e9f3;" |


Dark grey for discredited taxa:

|style="background:#E6E6E6;" |


Peach for Ichnotaxa:

|style="background:#FEF6E4;" |


Light blue for Ootaxa:

|style="background:#E3F5FF;" |


Light green for Morphotaxa:

|style="background:#D1FFCF;" |

add ref.[edit]

Can someone please add this reference to the Javelina Formation page? Thanks!

Hunt, ReBecca K. and Thomas M. Lehman. 2008. Attributes of the ceratopsian dinosaur Torosaurus, and new material from the Javelina Formation (Maastrichtian) of Texas. Journal of Paleontology 82(6): 1127-1138.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinochick (talkcontribs) 00:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] 

Tyrannosaurs[edit]

Daspletosaurus and Tyrannosaurus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.176.114.76 (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC) I re-checked the reference on Daspletasaurus and tracked down a new reference for Tyrannosaurus, everything checks out. 01:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly one or both of these is misclassified. Daspletosaurus is so over lumped it's basically a form taxon at this point... MMartyniuk (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It could be, but I only did skimmed to confirm that each genus was actually mentioned as being found in the javelina. Ryan shell (talk) 23:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probably some random tyrannosaur fragments put in Daspletosaurus for some reason.142.176.114.76 (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]