Talk:Japanese destroyer Take (1944)

Japanese destroyer Take (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 6, 2024.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese destroyer Take (1944) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Japan: Military history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:56, May 7, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Take (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 09:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review[edit]

After a quick read, the article looks good. A more thorough review will follow shortly. Djmaschek (talk) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review 1[edit]

GA class = Passed. After writing up the review, I decided to make the changes listed in the last 3 bullet points because they were so minor. Djmaschek (talk) 02:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written. Done But please see my notes below.
Verifiable. Done
Broad coverage. Done
Neutral. Done
Stable. Done
Illustrated. Done
Specs in text match those in infobox. Done
Construction and career, paragraph 3: This is written correctly. However, when I read it, I was confused by the fact that TA-4 went first followed by TA-3. So, I had to reread it carefully. My suggestion is to change "the troop ships" to "the TA-4 troop ships". This should clear up any confusion in readers like me.
Construction and career, paragraph 4, sentences 6, 7 & 8: The tense suddenly changes from past to present tense. There are 3 words "is" that need to be changed to "was" and one "are" that needs to be changed to "were". (convoy is; are sunk; is badly; Take is not.)
Construction and career, paragraph 5: USS Cooper needs a hyperlink.