Talk:Jamie Marchi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism; re:Vic Mignogna sexual harrassment controversy[edit]

This page was getting vandalized due to Marchi's allegations of sexual harassment against Vic Mignogna. The Monica Rial, Pensacon and Vic Mignogna pages were made semi-protected after being vandalized for the same reasons, and often are un-sourced edits with heavy bias against people who have spoken against Mr. Mignogna; I think this page should be made semi-protected as well. --PatManDX (talk) 03:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Marchi is currently sued by Vic Mignogna due to her internet allegations. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the statement about the difficulty of the service processor in contacting Marchi in order to server her the legal notice of the lawsuit. It doesn't explain any significance to the lawsuit and it was not backed up by a reliable third-party source. I also tagged Marchi's sexual harassment claims as requiring a third-party source, preferably not ANN because they are an involved party. This is one issue were we (Wikipedia) should not be citing first-party sources to verify the content. —Farix (t | c) 00:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced yet when it is given sourced you change the goal posts. Acting like the CCP or the kremlin when making a law. Keeping it as vague as possible to allow your own bias over rule. For one there is a lot more to the story and the same citations and sources are perfectly acceptable in other pages yet depending on the subject the rules are applied differently. Justify it all you want but it is clearly visible. It is one thing to stop the crazy hate and personal attacks it is another to removed sourced quotes that are controversial. Sure, should not be the lead or front and center but censoring controversies entirely is obviously what is happening. Weather you agree with one side or another that only hurts wikipedia site overall. Things like this only gives more ammo to countries that block and ban wikipedia. This is a huge disservice to freedom of information let alone to the community at general that uses wikipedia. You really should try to limit such bias in the moderation of the edits. Protecting truth is one thing and censoring controversies is quite another. 2602:41:8022:D200:7187:B9BA:D2C3:7C55 (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammer[edit]

I see one grammer error when talking about her role in that one episode of Family Guy so if anyone could be good and fix up that error that would be great ok Kirbopher2004 (talk) 03:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]