Talk:James W. Pennebaker

James W. Pennebaker was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 31, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvements[edit]

I would think to get this article out of the stub category a few things can be done. One major thing that would help the visual apeal would be a picture to look at. Also, more background information and information about more recent things. Also, information about each book he has written. Hr168407 (talk) 03:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have already made some improvments to this article. I have add a positions section and a section on his teaching experience. I plan to add a picture and much more indepth information to existing sections. Hr168407 (talk) 03:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good plan. --MTHarden (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that there are a few things to be done in order to improve this article. First, do some more research. When I look at the page, I don't see much. I see that he is still living, which makes it a little harder, but I know there is more information out there to be used for this page. I feel that the "Positions" section is unnecessary due to the fact that there is nothing really informative besides what his titles were. If anything, make that section into a paragraph and discuss what he did when he held each of those titles. I just think that more information and more time would make this into a pretty good article. Find more information about him as a child and how he became interested in this - walk us through his life, his accomplishments, his contribution, etc... Good luck!! Kehr47 (talk) 23:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

THINGS TO ADD[edit]

Pennebaker has many publication and I would like to add a few more and add http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/faculty/pennebaker/Reprints/index.htm for followers to see the full list of publications.

I want to introduce his research team and the http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/students/Tausczik/Lab_Group/labgroup2010.html homepage.

Added some info to the introduction from two different cites.

I have already picked out the picture to place in the introduction section. Hr168407 (talk) 16:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Overall, pretty solid article. The only thing I would recommend, if possible, is getting a picture. That info box over to the right looks a bit desolate without a photo. Also under positions where it has like, "2005- Chair of..." I would recommend putting "2005-present" if that's the case. It looks like it goes straight into the actual position and it's a little confusing. Arossomanno (talk) 04:20, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on James W. Pennebaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]