Talk:James Park Woods

James Park Woods is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 18, 2019.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 15, 2019	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
December 23, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
May 25, 2019	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 10, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that James Park Woods was awarded the Victoria Cross in 1918 for leading a small squad in the capture of a "very formidable" enemy post and the subsequent repulsion of multiple counterattacks?
Current status: Featured article

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / South Pacific / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War I task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Australia: Military history Mid‑importance

	Australia portal James Park Woods is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article was created or added to during the Victoria Cross Reference Migration. It may contain material that was used with permission from victoriacross.net.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Park Woods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Highest award[edit]

Does anyone else think there's a need for something similar to this edit, which is one of mine that was reverted. I decided not to discuss it further at the time because the article was featured on the Main Page.

However, I still think the sentence is problematic as it stands. To me it seems to imply that a higher award than the Victoria Cross has since been created, particularly to anyone unfamiliar with Commonwealth awards. I think the word "could" is enough in an introductory sentence to indicate past tense. Details about the 1991 creation of the Victoria Cross for Australia could be given further down in the article if needed. (@Peacemaker67: pinging as a courtesy.) Meticulo (talk) 14:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've used this formulation for half-a-dozen VC FAs and no-one has questioned it to my memory, so I think it is fine. I'd be happy to add a note in the body to explain that it has now been superseded by the VC for Australia. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've have used similar wording (as in, "at the time") in the context of articles for New Zealand VC recipients, although only one of those has been brought forward for FA consideration so it is not as well tested as Peacemaker67's examples. In the article body for these articles, I have a cited explanatory text to the effect of "Instituted in 1856, the VC was the highest gallantry award that could be bestowed on a soldier of the British Empire." At A-Class level at least this has not attracted any issues. Zawed (talk) 04:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are various explanation why its no longer the highest award and "at the time" doesn't imply any particular explanation. A note that the VC was replaced in 1991 with the VC for Australia would give that explanation if it was felt necessary. --Find bruce (talk) 03:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My reading of the phrase "at the time" seems a solitary one, so I concede. I've added to the Later life section an explanatory sentence about the Victoria Cross for Australia. Please improve as needed (particularly my citation style, which doesn't seem to fit with others in the footnotes). Thanks, Meticulo (talk) 13:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]