Talk:Jack FM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WCBS-FM-HD2[edit]

It is wrong to call New York's 101.1 WCBS-FM's HD2 "WCBS-HD2" Since WCBS is a AM station at at 880 and calling it WCBS-HD2 makes it sound like the HD2 belongs to WCBS 880 and not WCBS-FM 101.1. It I thik it should be called WCBS-FM-HD2 as Jack FM Identifies it’s self at the top of every hour.

DLA75 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Elimination round[edit]

I eliminated this as I didn't think it was valid:

In short, it can easily be said that the JACK FM program, particularly the one that took over New York's 101.1, is disgraceful to listen to. Oldies fans from NY can immediately attest to this fact. The most unfortunate part about JACK is that it makes it difficult for fans of the stations that JACK knocks off are left in the lurch. Using NY's CBS-FM 101.1 as an example, NYC oldies fans now have to turn to stations such as Long Island's 103.1 FM or Philadelphia's 960 AM. However, these signals are weak, and most fans are deprived of hearing their favorite music on the radio.

This is really a comment on the radio industry switching formats on a whim, which has nothing to do with the Jack-FM format. Here in Vancouver most listeners were glad to see Kiss-FM go. Kiss-FM was truly a MUZAK type station that had a playlist of about 8 "easy-listening favourites". --Webgeer 20:37, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for removing that, Webgeer, as the comment was blatently POV. Jack replaced The Arrow here in Los Angeles, but truth be told, there isn't much of an audible difference between the two. Yours with wikilovelyness -- Two Halves

The New York change was a lot more controversial than in other places because a historical station was changed with no warning (even other radio industry executives and the mayor derided it), but I have to agree that taking out the above was correct as it is extremely non-NPOV and has nothing to do with describing Jack-FM itself. I think the way the issue is currently described in this article (with some minor edits I just did noting the mayor's criticism, etc.) is perfect. Whoever put the Baltimore station issue on there (which I didn't even know about) is good because it is a perfect lead-in to the WCBS-FM story. --hairymon

Failures section: Confusion with Bob-FM ??[edit]

From Jack-FM Article:

Honolulu, Hawaii and Sacramento, California are the only North American markets so far where the format has failed; though in the Honolulu case Salem Communications acquired the station and likely would have jettisoned the format, regardless of its success, due to that company's programming philosophy. In Sacramento, the owner of the station requested that listeners "vote" whether the adult hits format or an 80's format should remain, as the owners were selling the frequency which housed the 80's format.

And from Bob-FM

So far, Honolulu, Hawaii and Sacramento, California are the only North American markets so far where Bob FM has failed; though in the Honolulu case Salem Communications acquired the station and likely would have jettisoned the format, regardless of its success, due to that company's programming philosophy. In Sacramento, the owner of the station requested that listeners "vote" whether the variety hits format or an 80's format should remain, as the owners were selling the frequency which housed the 80's format. The 80s format won, and 92.1 Bob FM turned into Flash 92.1.


Can anyone confirm that both of these stations had both Jack-FM and Bob-FM and dropped them both?

I cannot determine which Honolulu station had Jack/Bob, and can only find record of Bob-FM in Sacramento. DonutLover


Based on the last paragraph in this article, I'm removing the assertation that Jack-FM stations left the format and leaving them in the Bob-FM article. DonutLover 21:17, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the real issue here is that some people are treating Bob FM stations as simply "Jack clones" in this article, rather than discussing them in the actual Bob FM article, and then consequently conflating the two (so that if a Bob fails, it's a priori a Jack failure.) I can't speak for what anyone else has done, but I've already removed "Bob" stations from the list of "Jack clones" in this article more than once. Bearcat 23:49, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One line sounds like an advertisement[edit]

"However, ongoing research has confirmed that listeners would rather hear Jack's huge range of music without the stereotypical announcer banter."

It's "huge range of music" versus "stereotypical announcer banter". And it has been "confirmed". Very definitive and slanted.

Buffalo NY[edit]

does anybody know why Buffalo doesn't use Cogan as the voice?

i assume it's an attempt to distance themselves from 92.5 in Toronto (which can be picked up in buffalo, and was pretty popular with the locals)...

Adult hits[edit]

There's now a separate article on the adult hits format in general; accordingly, this article should now list only stations that are specifically branded as Jack FM. "Clone" stations are to be listed at adult hits, not here. Bearcat 18:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CBS Footer[edit]

Is there a reason that the CBS Broadcasting footer is in the article? Jack-FM is not an exclusive property of CBS Radio, as the article notes. I think the CBS footer should be removed from this article. DonutLover 01:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one has objected, I'll remove the footer at this time. DonutLover 19:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

too negative[edit]

I think the article written on Jack FM focuses too much on the controversy and negative press and criticism that the station has received.

What the article fails to mention is that after Jack rode out the wave of initial negative press after their induction into many markets, they have since found widespread acceptance among many listeners: enough to rank them in the top three in ratings in many markets like in my hometown of Las Vegas.

Rather than decry the loss of DJ's, fans like me prefer to hear nearly nonstop music without the interruption of talk.

This article is not too negative,if it is it's because it true. And fans like me actually like DJs, not the same songs played day after day. 98.240.76.78 (talk) 22:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

iPod[edit]

One of the main criticisms of the Jack FM format has been that with the elimination (or at least reduction) of the role of the DJ, radio is losing its main selling point over an iPod, which is the sense that a live person is programming your music.

Isn't the whole point of the iPod that there is a live person programming your music, YOU?

It does seem that this article is slanted toward a negative tone, I didn't used to like Jack FM, but it has really grown on me. Its just something different from the norm of dj's talking over music and making bad jokes.


==Fair use rationale for Image:Jackfmlogo.gif== [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]] Image:Jackfmlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jackfmcrownlogo.gif[edit]

Image:Jackfmcrownlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who's Perry?[edit]

This article makes repeated reference to someone named "Perry", but does not once tell the reader who the heck Perry is. Can anyone shed some light on this and perhaps edit the article to reflect it? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.16.135 (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:KOJK-master.png[edit]

The image File:KOJK-master.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Jack FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Wish we had jackfm in Cleveland and Chattanooga Tennessee areas I miss listening to you guys 166.181.85.128 (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jack_FM&oldid=1207168656"