Talk:Italian ironclad Venezia/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 13:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this one for a review. As always, I'm doubtful there will be much, so expect nitpicks more than anything.

Link Regia Marina where you mention the Italian Navy in the second paragraph of Design. It'll be the first time it has been mentioned in the article body itself.
Link rigging where you mention rigged (you've already got barque covered)

That's it really. Shame there isn't more to it, but it's a ship that never saw any combat and was outdated upon her launch. Plus, I trust that you've got access to all the relevent sources and would have included everything. Ping me back when you've added those links and I'll come back and promote. Miyagawa (talk) 13:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both linked, thanks for reviewing the article. It would be nice to be able to look through the Italian Navy's archives, since they'd presumably have more details, but I don't think a trip to Rome is in the cards. And unfortunately, the Italian Naval History Office hasn't produced a work like the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (at least that I'm aware of). Parsecboy (talk) 14:11, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same feeling towards some of the archives donated by the producers of the various TV shows I work up articles on. Anyway, happy to promote at this point. Miyagawa (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]