Talk:Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano

Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 3, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one. Comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Repeated use of "...she was..."
- Changed the one in the middle - see if that's better.
The link to Vacca in the lead is to a different individual with the same name. The name is a redlink later in the article.
- Created a stub on the right guy, though it needs a fair bit of work.
"...;the leading squadron of the Italian fleet...": I'm struggling with the phrasing here as there is no context for how the squadron relates to the ship.
- I figured it was clear that the ship was part of the leading squadron, since it previously says she was the first ship in the line.

Design/Infobox

Length is given as 72.98m in text, 72.89m in the infobox.
- Good catch, .98 is correct.
Short/Long tons conversion missing in the infobox for normal displacement.
- Unless I'm missing something, normal displacement is in the infobox.
The link to propulsion is referred to as plural in the infobox but ship only has one engine.
- Fixed
Inconsistency in number of boilers.
- Fixed

Service history

"...on June 27, in attempt to..." > "...on June 27, in an attempt to..."
- Good catch
link Adriatic.
- Done
Dupelinks: Austrian Navy, Affondatore, coastal defense ship, Pola, and turret ships are all linked twice.
- Fixed
"...enter the harbor Vis..." > "...enter Vis' harbor..."?
- Fixed
"They there thus..." > "They were thus..."
- Sometimes I wonder why my fingers type what they do.

Later career

"Italia-classs" > "Italia-classes"?
- Fixed

References

Can an OCLC number be found for Wilson?
- Added.

Overall, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone, and has reasonable coverage of the subject. The tags on the images appear appropriate. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 04:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another review, Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, passing as a GA. Good work. Zawed (talk) 05:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]