Talk:Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo

Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 8, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Save for later[edit]

this has details (and a nice line drawing) on the reconstruction. Parsecboy (talk) 11:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this has details for 1902. Parsecboy (talk) 11:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has details on the reconstruction. Parsecboy (talk) 00:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another here. Parsecboy (talk) 19:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 12:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the review - I'm expecting it to be brief and nitpicky in nature I'm afraid, as the quality of your articles is obvious.

Link Bow (ship) and Stern in the final sentence of the second paragraph of Design.

I told you it'd be nitpicky! That's all I've got. Once you've added those, ping me and I'll come back and promote. Miyagawa (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea - both are linked now. Thanks for your review and kind words. Parsecboy (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, promoting now. Miyagawa (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]