Talk:Italian cruiser Pietro Micca

Italian cruiser Pietro Micca has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Italian cruiser Pietro Micca is part of the Torpedo cruisers of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 2, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
August 6, 2019	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Pietro Micca/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 18:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

The article complies with MOS policies on grammar/wording, as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article cites several reputable publications. There are no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all relevant information for which reliable sourcing could be found. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since its creation back in June this year, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring or similarly disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

On this part, passed as non-applicable at present. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]