Talk:Italian cruiser Marsala/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 00:59, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	suggest a note is added to explain calibre of guns ie L/50 Added the speeds in the infobox and text don't match Fixed - was a copy-paste error from Nino Bixio do we know where her torpedo tubes were mounted? Unfortunately no, I'd assume because there were only 2 they were on the broadside, but Conway's doesn't say. suggest adding the namesake of the ship, Marsala, the Sicilian landing place of Garibaldi in 1860. Good idea
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	just a query as to why the power output isn't in the infobox? Not a war-stopper, but just for a consistent approach to infoboxes I forgot when I filled in the infobox, good catch. I think there is something weird going on with the infobox begin template Hmm, I don't see anything. Must be me... no matter. suggest using the displaytitle template to italicise the ship's name in the title Added
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	ok
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	ok
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	ok
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No images
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No images
	7. Overall assessment.	~~On hold for seven days for a few comments to be addressed~~ All comments addressed, well done. Passing.