Talk:Italian cruiser Etna

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Etna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:39, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	the max speed in the text does not match that in the infobox Fixed the converted bore of the main and secondary guns is in cm in the infobox and mm in the text both now mm suggest a note re: caliber I cribbed this part of the article from the class article, which Sturm wrote - I left his method of just linking to caliber in the text - do you think it still needs the note? I'm pretty relaxed about it, so long as either a note or a link is provided. I prefer the note, because it is explicit, but at GA, the link is okazay with me. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 11:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC) were carried How about adding a "that" instead? Works for me. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 11:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC) the mm conversions of the TT don't match between the text and infobox Fixed The sShe was protected Good catch suggest adding the conning tower armor to the infobox Added During the First Italo-Ethiopian War... Was hurrying when I was writing that last night - oops! Giovanni Bausan and torpedo boat are overlinked Fixed both
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Both appear fine.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Placing on hold for seven days for comments to be addressed Passing GA, all points addressed.