Talk:It's True! It's True!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the It's True! It's True! article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Template correction[edit]

In case my IP edit is automatically reverted, the track-listing template used resulted in the line "All songs written and composed by Bill Cosby". These are not songs, obviously, so I removed that line and replaced it manually with a specific line about material. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 14:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll see if there's a way to do that with the template itself. — Cirt (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise on Spanish fly info[edit]

Compromise = 1) removed info from body text of article. (2) = changed to footnote. Please see DIFF.

Perhaps we could discuss better sources to use instead or in addition, here on the talk page?

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 17:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The info should be changed back from being a footnote into being body text. As a footnote, it breaks reading flow, as people have to click to view it, and have to click again to get back. It seems trivial that such a drug doesn't work, but I'm not sure every reader knows that. --Distelfinck (talk) 15:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Distelfinck, but I'll wait to see if others from the community want to chip in with opinions before making that change. — Cirt (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]