Talk:Ippolito ed Aricia
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Copyvio[edit]
The synopsis of this article is an unusably close paraphrase of the Cliffs Notes Summary, which begin here. While some passages have been sufficiently revised, others contain too much of the language and structure of the original. For a few points of comparison, see:
- Article: She gives up her suicide plan in order to arrange an alliance with Hippolytus against Aricia, which would also preserve her own son's right to the throne of Athens.
- Source: ...she gives up her suicide plan in order to arrange an alliance with Hippolytus against Aricia, to preserve her own son's right to the throne of Athens.
- Article: As she rushes out, Theramenes comes in with a shocking rumor: Theseus may still be alive. Hippolytus decides to investigate the rumor and to fight against Phaedra's claim to the throne and in defense of Aricia's rights.
- Source:As she rushes out, Theramenes comes in with a momentous rumor: Theseus may be alive. Hippolytus decides to investigate the rumor and to fight against Phaedra's claim to the throne and in defense of Aricia's rights.
- Article: She convinces a reluctant Oenone to plead her case with Hippolytus. However the situation changes drastically when Theseus returns to the court.
- Source: she now urges a reluctant Oenone to plead her case with Hippolytus. However the situation changes drastically with the news of Theseus' return
- Article: Theseus greets him with harsh accusations that culminate in a prayer to Neptune for revenge. Hippolytus defends himself by pointing out his reputation for virtue and by confessing his love for Aricia.
- Source: greets him with immoderate accusations, culminating in a prayer to Neptune for revenge. Hippolytus, out of filial consideration, defends himself by pointing out his reputation for virtue and reminding Theseus of Phaedra's ancestry, and by confessing his love for Aricia.
- Article: Immediately after his departure Theseus abruptly appears. In spite of her embarrassment, Aricia stands up to him and defends Hippolytus' innocence with such conviction that the king's certainty is shaken.
- Source: Immediately after his departure Theseus abruptly appears. In spite of her embarrassment, Aricia stands up to him and defends Hippolytus' innocence with such conviction that the king's certainty is shaken.
This material needs to be rewritten in original language or removed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note to administrators: I had previously re-written the synopsis at Talk:Ippolito ed Aricia/Temp to remove the copy vio. However, with further research, I find that the source synopsis that had been copied was essentially that of Racine's play and that the actual opera has very substantial deviations from that plot. A full description of Fulgoni's libretto for the opera can be found in Chapter 3 of Opera and sovereignty: transforming myths in eighteenth-century Italy by Martha Feldman (University of Chicago Press, 2007, ISBN 0226241130).
- I strongly suggest simply deleting the current synopsis and removing the copyvio template. An accurate synopsis can always be added later. Voceditenore (talk) 10:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed[edit]
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/WileyCDA/LitNote/Phaedra-Play-Summary.id-142,pageNum-1.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)