Talk:Intralaminar thalamic nuclei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Graph and Text[edit]

Sorry, could it be that the figure does not match the text? In the graph I don't see the nuclei mentioned in the text, and vice versa. Also, in the figure it should probably be "interthalamic adhesion", not "intrathalmic adhesion", so I wonder how reliable the figure is. Strasburger (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 June 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Nominator has shown that the suggested name is the common name. (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Intralaminar nuclei of thalamusIntralaminar thalamic nuclei – In article lead already and by far the most common name since 2000: Google Ngrams Facts707 (talk) 09:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to Terminologia Anatomica, the official term describing this structure is "intralaminar nuclei of thalamus". --Athikhun.suw (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.