Talk:Intra-frame coding

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Merge from Macroblocks[edit]

Please merge any relevant content from Macroblocks per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macroblocks. Thanks. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-28 14:26Z

Correct error[edit]

The first words say Inter-frame where it should say Intra-frame. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.148.186.173 (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, inter frames consist of P- and B-frames sharing data between (inter) themselves and anchor frames (I->P->P and I->B<-P). Next time, be bold. --213.216.199.6 (talk) 14:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

This should really be merged with Video compression picture types which contains definition of P and B frames.Henk.muller (talk) 10:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is ProRes a GOP codec?[edit]

From the article: "It is part of an intra-frame codec like ProRes: a group of pictures codec without inter frames." In what way is ProRes a GOP codec if it has no inter-frames? If it's technically true that ProRes is a GOP codec, perhaps this sentence could be re-worded to be less confusing, because as it is it seems to contradict the "Group of pictures" article. If it's not a GOP codec, perhaps this should be rewritten. Thanks. Chconnor (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the same. I would define ProRes in opposition to GoP codecs. 210.54.156.2 (talk) 06:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://users.cs.cf.ac.uk/Dave.Marshall/Multimedia/node248.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 18:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]